Gates: Nations relunctance linked to Iraq
MUNICH, Germany (AP) - February 8, 2008 Gates said he would attempt in a speech here Sunday at an
international security conference to decouple perceptions of the
Iraq war, in which NATO has no fighting role, from views of
Afghanistan, where NATO is in charge of the fighting but has fallen
short on commanders' requests for more troops.
On a flight to Munich from Vilnius, Lithuania, where he attended
two days of NATO talks dominated by Afghanistan, Gates associated
Iraq with what lay behind Europe's general skepticism about
fighting in Afghanistan.
"From our perspective, I worry that for many Europeans the
missions in Iraq and Afghanistan are confused," he told reporters
traveling with him, implicitly acknowledging a political cost of
the Iraq invasion.
"I think they combine the two," he added. "Many of them I
think have a problem with our involvement in Iraq and project that
to Afghanistan and don't understand the very different - for them -
very different kind of threat" posed by al-Qaida in Afghanistan,
as opposed to the militant group in Iraq that goes by the same name
and is thought to be led by foreign terrorists linked to al-Qaida.
Germany, which is hosting the Munich conference and which has
refused Gates' explicit appeals to send combat forces to southern
Afghanistan, and France were among the most vocal opponents of the
Iraq invasion prior to the war. Britain has been the most
supportive, and it has the second-largest number of troops in
Afghanistan.
Despite earlier refusals, France now is considering sending
troops to join the fight against the Taliban in southern
Afghanistan after Canada's appeal for 1,000 extra forces to support
its beleaguered force in volatile Kandahar province. French
officials cautioned that it was unlikely Paris would provide all
the troops Canada is seeking and said a decision was unlikely
before April, when NATO leaders meet for a summit in Bucharest,
Romania.
Such a move could ease tensions in NATO, where a rift has
emerged between nations such as the United States, Canada and
Britain who have troops in the south, and those like France,
Germany and Italy whose units operates in the relative safety of
north and west Afghanistan.
NATO, through its International Security Assistance Force, is in
charge of the war, although the top commander is an American, Army
Gen. Daniel McNeill, and the United States is the biggest provider
of troops. Of the 42,000 total troops, about 14,000 are American,
plus the United States has another 13,000 operating separately in
eastern Afghanistan hunting terrorists and training Afghan forces.
Gates suggested that while not all Europeans see the various
insurgent elements in Iraq as part of the international terror
problem, they might be persuaded on the issue of Afghanistan, which
was a refuge for Osama bin Laden's al-Qaida network and a launching
pad for the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.
Gates has argued that if Afghanistan were allowed to fail, it
could again become a haven for al-Qaida and that Europe would be
one its top targets.
"Our view, from the U.S. standpoint, is that al-Qaida in Iraq
is not just a problem for Iraq, but let's leave that aside," he
said. "I want to focus on why al-Qaida in Afghanistan and failure
in Afghanistan would be a security problem for Europe."
As he has previously, Gates also made the point that some
European allies have coalition governments with little political
maneuvering room on such a sensitive topic as Afghanistan. He also
praised those allied countries which have contributed combat troops
as well as those helping in other ways.
He noted news reports that France might be willing to send
combat troops into southern Afghanistan and he said this would be a
welcome addition.
He said none of the allies made commitments to provide more
troops in Afghanistan. Nonetheless, he said the discussions were
cordial and that he was encouraged by what he described as an
impression that some defense ministers are considering "what more
they might be able to do" on the troop issue.
Gates said that parts of his speech on Sunday would be
"directed at Europeans, not their governments, in an effort to try
to explain why their security is tied to success in Afghanistan"
and how the outcome in Afghanistan could affect the future of the
NATO alliance, which originally was designed to protect Europe, the
United States and Canada against a military threat by the former
Soviet Union.
In congressional testimony on Wednesday, Gates expressed a fear
that NATO could devolve into a "two-tiered alliance," with some
member countries doing the fighting in NATO's name and others
refusing.
"I remain concerned about that," Gates said in the in-flight
interview. "I don't think we're there at this point. I'm not sure
we're even really close. But I see it out there in the more distant
future if ... these current conditions continue well into the
future and get worse."
Gates was asked about the possibility that his direct appeal to
Europeans on the issue of an al-Qaida threat to their homelands
might backfire.
"There always is a risk it will be counterproductive," he
replied. "I am going to try and do this in a very measured way so
that I don't come across as (saying), `The sky is falling."'