A court hearing will be held Wednesday in the case of The Newspaper Guild of Greater Philadelphia against Philadelphia Newspapers LLC, a unit of Philadelphia Media Holdings. U.S.
District Court Judge Berle M. Schiller has granted a temporary restraining order.
The judge said that while the pensions have merged, the funds haven't been commingled.
The lawsuit, filed last week, said the merger's only purpose was to bail out the underfunded North Broad Street plan "without regard" to the participants of the Guild's healthier pension fund.
"It's an imminent danger to our future pensioners," said Henry Holcomb, the Guild's president and pension fund trustee.
The union has accused the company's trustees of violating federal employee benefits laws and breaching their fiduciary duty by "failing to perform a detailed analysis of the impact on the participants of each plan."
But the company argued in separate court documents that it had the right to merge the pensions. The Guild had until the end of 2007 to find a multi-employer pension with which to merge. Failing that, the company said, it had the right to take over the plan - and directed a merger with the North Broad fund.
Philadelphia Newspapers said both pensions benefit Guild members. The company also said it did perform an analysis of the merger's impact and accrued employee benefits will not be reduced.
As of March 1, the Guild pension plan was fully funded with assets of $193 million and liabilities of $180 million covering 2,344 members. The North Broad pension, with nearly 900 members and almost all belonging to the Guild, is 39 percent funded as of Jan.
1, 2007.
Under new federal pension rules, the company would have had to add $8 million to the North Broad plan to enable lump-sum severance payments to retirees or terminated employees at a time when it's fighting falling advertising and classified ad revenue.
Merging the two pensions would stop the North Broad fund from being insolvent, according to court documents.
