FCC set to reconsider broadband regulations
June 17, 2010 The Federal Communications Commission is scheduled to vote
Thursday to begin taking public comments on three different paths
for regulating broadband. That includes a proposal by FCC Chairman
Julius Genachowski, a Democrat, to define broadband access as a
telecommunications service subject to "common carrier"
obligations to treat all traffic equally.
Genachowski's proposal is a response to a federal appeals court
ruling that has cast doubt on the agency's authority over broadband
under its existing regulatory framework.
The plan has the backing of many big Internet companies, which
say it would ensure the FCC can prevent phone and cable companies
from using their control over broadband connections to determine
what subscribers can do online.
"There is a real urgency to this because right now there are no
rules of the road to protect consumers from even the most egregious
discriminatory behavior by telephone and cable companies," said
Markham Erickson, executive director of the Open Internet
Coalition. The group's members include Google Inc., eBay Inc.,
Amazon.com Inc. and online calling service Skype Ltd.
But Genachowski's plan faces stiff resistance from the broadband
providers themselves, including AT&T Inc. and Verizon
Communications Inc. They say it opens the door to onerous and
outdated regulations that would discourage them from upgrading
their networks.
"This FCC proposal could call into question the business
assumptions underlying multibillion-dollar broadband investments,"
said Howard Waltzman, a former Republican staffer on the House
Commerce Committee who is now representing telephone companies as a
partner with Mayer Brown LLP.
Many Republicans and even some Democrats on Capitol Hill - as
well as the two Republicans on the five-member FCC - oppose
Genachowski's plan. At least one House Republican, Rep. John
Culberson of Texas, has proposed blocking funding for the FCC if it
pursues the plan.
The FCC currently defines broadband as a lightly regulated
information service. But in April, the U.S. Court of Appeals for
the District of Columbia ruled that this approach does not give the
commission the authority it needs to adopt so-called "network
neutrality" mandates, which would bar broadband providers from
favoring or discriminating against traffic traveling over their
networks.
Supporters of network neutrality say such rules are necessary to
prevent phone and cable companies from blocking or degrading online
calling services, Internet video and other applications that
compete with their core businesses.
Indeed, the recent appeals court decision grew out of a
challenge by Comcast Corp. to a 2008 FCC order directing the cable
company to stop blocking subscribers from accessing an online
file-sharing service. Comcast and other broadband providers insist
they need flexibility to manage their networks and ensure that
certain applications don't hog too much bandwidth.
The court ruling also undermines the FCC's ability to act on
several key recommendations in its national broadband plan -
another top priority for Genachowski - including a proposal to
expand high-speed Internet access by tapping the federal program
that subsidizes phone service in poor and rural areas.
Genachowski says his new regulatory framework would allow the
FCC to move ahead on both fronts by placing broadband connections
firmly within the agency's jurisdiction as a telecommunications
service. At the same time, he has pledged to impose only narrow
telecom rules on broadband providers, avoiding burdensome mandates
such as rate regulations and network-sharing obligations. He has
also stressed that his approach would not impose regulations on
Internet content and services.
In outlining his proposal last month, Genachowski called it a
"third way" that respects "investment and innovation" and
protects consumers and Internet competition.
Thursday's vote will launch a proceeding to examine:
-Genachowski's proposal;
-the implications of leaving the existing regulatory frawework
in place;
-and the implications of imposing the full array of traditional
telecommunications regulations on broadband providers.
If the FCC ultimately adopts Genachowski's plan, it will almost
certainly draw legal challenges from phone and cable companies that
fear any shift away from the current deregulatory approach adopted
under the Bush administration. That approach was upheld by the
Supreme Court in 2005 and a battle over any attempt to overturn it
could go all the way back to the high court.
BC-US--SpaceX-Satellite Deal, 1st Ld-Writethru,0253
SpaceX signs deal to launch commercial satellites
Eds: Moving on general news and financial services.
LOS ANGELES (AP) - SpaceX has inked a $492 million deal with
Iridium Communications Inc. to launch a fleet of next-generation
commercial satellites aboard its Falcon 9 rocket.
The deal, to be announced Wednesday, comes two weeks after
Falcon 9 reached orbit on its maiden test flight.
Iridium previously announced plans to replace its current
satellite network by launching six dozen next-generation satellites
between 2015 and 2017 at a cost of $2.9 billion. The company, which
covers the whole world, uses the satellites to provide voice and
data services for commercial and government clients.
Neither company would say how many Falcon 9 launches would be
required to put the satellites into low-Earth orbit from Vandenberg
Air Force Base, Calif. Each rocket launch will carry multiple
satellites into space.
"It's a perfect marriage," Iridium chief executive Matt Desch
said of the agreement with SpaceX.
While SpaceX will be the main launch provider, Iridium expects
to sign with at least one more rocket maker.
SpaceX - or Space Exploration Technologies - is run by PayPal
founder Elon Musk. NASA hopes to use SpaceX to haul supplies and
possibly astronauts to the International Space Station once the
space shuttles retire.
Musk called the Iridium deal "a very big endorsement." The
satellite phone company had its choice of international launch
providers, but ultimately chose Hawthorne, Calif.-based SpaceX.
"Falcon 9 is the vehicle of choice both for the federal
government and the commercial sector," Musk said.