Study: Scant evidence that medical pot helps many illnesses

WPVI logo
Wednesday, June 24, 2015
VIDEO: Study: Little evidence that medical marijuana works
A new study shows there is little evidence that medical marijuana actually works for the illnesses that it's approved for.

CHICAGO, Ill (WPVI) -- A new study casts doubt on whether medical marijuana can live up to what supporters claim.

23 states now allow marijuana for medical uses.

Approved conditions vary but include Alzheimer's disease, epilepsy, glaucoma, kidney disease, lupus and Parkinson's disease.

New Jersey has for several years. It will soon be available in Delaware, and there's a drive to approve it in Pennsylvania.

However, a major review of 79 studies shows there's little evidence it works for many illnesses states have approved it for.

The analysis is among several medical marijuana articles published Tuesday in the Journal of the American Medical Association.

They include a small study suggesting that many brand labels for edible marijuana products list inaccurate amounts of active ingredients.

More than half of brands tested had much lower amounts than labeled, meaning users might get no effect.

Researchers say the strongest evidence was for chronic pain and for muscle stiffness related to Multiple Sclerosis.

But marijuana was of little help for anxiety, sleep disorders, or Tourette's Syndrome.

The scientists say there is an acute need for more quality research.

Highlights from the journal:

THE ANALYSIS

The researchers pooled results from studies that tested marijuana against placebos, usual care or no treatment.

That's the most rigorous kind of research but many studies found no conclusive evidence of any benefit.

Side effects were common and included dizziness, dry mouth and sleepiness. A less extensive research review in the journal found similar results.

It's possible medical marijuana could have widespread benefits, but strong evidence from high-quality studies is lacking, authors of both articles say.

"It's not a wonder drug but it certainly has some potential," said Dr. Robert Wolff, a co-author and researcher with Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd., a research company in York, England.

EDIBLE PRODUCTS

Researchers evaluated 47 brands of medical marijuana products, including candy, baked goods and drinks, bought at dispensaries in Los Angeles, San Francisco and Seattle.

Independent laboratory testing for THC, marijuana's leading active ingredient, found accurate amounts listed on labels for just 13 of 75 products.

Almost 1 in 4 had higher amounts than labeled, which could cause ill effects. Most had lower-than-listed amounts. There were similar findings for another active ingredient. Products were not identified by name.

Johns Hopkins University researcher Ryan Vandrey, the lead author, said he was surprised so many labels were inaccurate. The researchers note, however, that the results may not be the same in other locations.

MARIJUANA LAWS

But in a notice published Tuesday in the Federal Register, the Department of Health and Human Services made it a little easier for privately funded medical marijuana research to get approved.

The department said that a federal Public Health Service review of research proposals is no longer necessary because it duplicates a required review by the Food and Drug Administration.

THE FUTURE

Colorado, one of a few states where recreational marijuana use is legal, has pledged more than $8 million in state funds for several studies on the drug's potential medical benefits, including whether it can reduce veterans' symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder.

That study may begin recruiting participants later this year, said Vandrey, one of that study's leaders.

Vandrey said there's a feeling of optimism in the research community that "we'll start to get a good science base" for the potential medical uses of marijuana.

THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The editorial by two Yale University psychiatrists suggests enthusiasm for medical marijuana has outpaced rigorous research and says widespread use should wait for better evidence. Federal and state governments should support and encourage such research, the editorial says.

"Perhaps it is time to place the horse back in front of the cart," Drs. Deepak Cyril D'Souza and Mohini Ranganathan wrote in the editorial.

They note that repeated recreational marijuana use can be addictive and say unanswered questions include what are the long-term health effects of medical marijuana use and whether its use is justified in children whose developing brains may be more vulnerable to its effects.