Transcripts: Fed worried inflation in 2002
WASHINGTON (AP) - April 11, 2008 Those transcripts, released Friday, showed that Greenspan and
his colleagues were focused on what should be done about a sluggish
economy and the threat that the country could tumble into a period
of deflation, something the country had not experienced since the
Great Depression.
While the Fed strives to achieve low inflation, it does not want
to see the economy enter a period of serious deflation with the
value of real estate and other assets dropping because that sets
off destabilizing forces that can have serious consequences. The
United States was battered by deflation during the 1930s and Japan
experienced a lost decade of growth in the 1990s after its real
estate bubble burst, causing a severe bout of deflation in that
country.
Some critics have argued that there was never a serious threat
of deflation in the United States in the period of the 2001
recession and that the extremely low interest rates engineered by
the Fed created a housing boom that drove prices and sales up to
record levels only to burst in 2006, sending shock waves through
the economy that are still reverberating.
The transcripts released Friday show that Fed officials at the
time were not that worried about the effects low interest rates
might have, arguing that if inflation started rising, the Fed could
reverse course and start raising rates but that a bout of deflation
would be harder to combat.
The Fed did cut the federal funds rate, the interest that banks
charge on overnight loans, by a half-point at the November 2002
meeting, moving it from 1.75 percent down to 1.25 percent, the
lowest level in 41 years. That was the only rate cut the Fed made
that year.
During the discussions, Greenspan expressed concern about the
country falling into a "deflationary hole."
"It's a pretty scary prospect and one that we certainly want to
avoid," Greenspan told other members of the Federal Open Market
Committee, the Fed panel that meets eight times a year to set
interest rates.
The Fed would cut the funds rate one more time the next year,
pushing it to a 45-year low of 1 percent on June 25, 2003. The
central bank left the funds rate at that level for an entire year
until it began a gradual move to raise rates in June 2004.
While Greenspan was hailed when he left the Fed in early 2006
after 18½ years as chairman for safely guiding the U.S. economy
through a number of dangers, the bursting of the housing boom that
year and a resulting severe credit crunch have prompted a
reassessment of those actions.
But in an interview on CNBC this week, Greenspan said he had
"no regrets" about Fed policy during his tenure and said there
was little Fed officials or other regulators could have done to
avert the housing crisis.
In the interview, Greenspan blamed the housing crisis on
"egregious lending practices" in the subprime mortgage market.
Critics charge that Greenspan pushed rates too low and left them
there too long, fueling a housing bubble that has now burst,
causing severe troubles including the possibility that the country
has fallen into a recession.
But at the time, Greenspan and his colleagues clearly saw the
biggest dangers coming from weak growth and possible deflationary
forces.
On the possibility that a half-point cut might be too much,
Greenspan said at the November meeting, "It's a mistake that does
not have very significant consequences. On the other hand, if we
fail to move and we are wrong, meaning that we needed to, the costs
could be quite high."
William McDonough, president of the New York Federal Reserve
Bank, argued that if the Fed cut rates by only a quarter-point,
financial markets would consider Fed officials "a bunch of wimps,
which is not an attractive assessment for a group that is supposed
to be a very important public body."
Current Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke, a former Princeton economics
professor who had joined the Fed earlier that year as a board
member, supported Greenspan's recommendation to cut rates by a
half-point.
Bernanke said the country seemed to be experiencing the same
type of "jobless recovery" that had occurred for a prolonged
period after the 1990-91 recession and that a cut in rates was
needed to boost growth.
While the Fed releases minutes of its closed-door discussions
three weeks after the meetings are held, the full transcripts are
only released with a lag of five years.
---
On the Net:
Federal Reserve: http://www.federalreserve.gov