Democrats struggle to find unity on health plan

WASHINGTON - October 28, 2009

In the wake of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's announcement that the Democratic bill would include the option of a government insurance plan, moderates in his own party lost no time in voicing their displeasure. The Nevada Democrat needs every Democrat to break the filibusters that Republicans are vowing to mount. But some of the moderates refuse to say whether they'll stick with their leader on procedural votes, let alone those on the merits of the bill.

"Until I've seen everything, I'm not for anything," moderate Sen. Ben Nelson, D-Neb., told home-state reporters in a conference call Wednesday. He said he was undecided on Reid's bill, and would prefer an approach where states could opt into a government insurance plan, instead of being permitted to opt out, as Reid would allow.

But, "I'm keeping an open mind," Nelson said. "Doing nothing is not one of the things that we can consider."

In the House, Speaker Nancy Pelosi has been laboring to finalize a consensus health care bill amid disagreements among Democrats.

House leaders were aiming to bring those negotiations to a close Wednesday, and were making plans to unveil their bill Thursday morning, according to a Democratic aide. The aide, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the plans were not yet public, cautioned that the timing could change. House leaders were scheduled to meet Wednesday afternoon to finalize their plans.

There are nine weeks left in the year to deliver a bill to Obama's desk.

Intense days and nights lie ahead, said Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla. Senators who don't like the bill will find themselves the focus of a "prayer session," said Nelson. "They will pray that the retribution of God doesn't come down on them," he joked.

Nonetheless, moderate Democratic senators who control the balance of power on health care were holding their ground. Republican opposition stiffened, and party leaders announced they would attempt to strangle the bill before formal debate begins.

Despite the obstacles, senior Democrats cast Reid's draft legislation as a turning point. Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, said there is now a "sense of inevitability ... that, yes, we're going to pass health care reform."

The government insurance option long ago emerged as the biggest flashpoint in both the House and Senate as Democrats try to pass legislation that extends coverage, bans insurance practices such as denial of coverage because of pre-existing medical conditions and slows the growth of health care spending nationally.

Before any substantive issue can be joined on the Senate floor, Reid's first challenge is to gain 60 votes - the number needed to overcome a filibuster by Republicans - just to bring the bill up, a parliamentary maneuver so routine that a vote is rarely required.

But Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Republican leader, announced that in this case, even procedural votes will count. That's because, in his view, the underlying bill would "cut Medicare, raise taxes and increase health insurance premiums." He suggested Democrats could expect campaign commercials next year on the basis of the vote.

Sen. Tom Carper, D-Del., said he may seek changes on the Senate floor, a move likely to be welcomed by moderates. He backs a government role in states where one or two insurers control the market and premiums are high, along the same lines as a plan supported by Sen. Olympia Snowe, R-Maine.

That general approach, in which a lack of competition in an individual's state would trigger a government insurance option, "is still alive," said Sen. Kent Conrad, D-N.D.

While Reid is expected to eventually secure all 60 Democratic votes on the critical first test to bring the bill to the Senate floor, Sens. Ben Nelson, Mary Landrieu of Louisiana, Evan Bayh of Indiana and Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas all have declined to say how they would vote.

In an indication of the pressure Reid faces, Bayh said the majority leader had agreed to cut an earlier proposal for a $40 billion tax on medical device makers.

"He significantly modified that proposal in a way that I understand will not impact thousands of good-paying jobs," said Bayh, whose state is home to Guidant Corp., a maker of cardiovascular devices, among other major industry players. Numerous officials said Reid had agreed to reduce the new tax to $20 billion over a decade. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because no announcement had been made.

In the House, the principal stumbling block has been disagreement among Democrats over how to set fees for doctors, hospitals and other health care providers participating in the public insurance plan.

Liberals want the government to set the rate unilaterally, pegged to the charges the government pays Medicare beneficiaries. Moderates want the government to negotiate with the providers in setting fees.

Pelosi favors the approach liberals want, but has been unable to muster the necessary majority of 218 votes for it.

House Democrats are also facing internal disagreements relating to federal funding for abortion services.


Associated Press writers David Espo, Julie Hirschfeld Davis, Ben Evans, Andrew Miga, Ken Thomas and Erica Werner contributed to this report.

Follow Action News on Twitter

Get Action News on your website

Follow Action News on Facebook

Click here to get the latest Philadelphia news and headlines from across the Delaware and Lehigh valleys.

Copyright © 2024 WPVI-TV. All Rights Reserved.